Quran Study Learn Word for Android

The creators of the app purposely removed the last 2 verses of Surah 9, due to their belief that they are not authentic… based on the teachings of a man they believe was a messenger (Rashad Khalifa)… an egyptian american who lived in USA. When contacting them, they refused to interact with any hadith brought to them that clearly proves their beliefs wrong. Please warn people about this app, and leave a one star review so others can see!

So so sad. This would have been a great app. The Quran used in this is by a guy named Rashad Khalifa. He does not accept Hadith. HE EVEN REMOVED THE LAST TWO VERSUS OF CHAPTER 9. I am staying far away from this app for these reasons. Shame on them in my opinion for at-least not acknowledging this difference from mainstream in there description. Hey app developers, I highly recommend you double check your understanding of quran only bo hadith and see people like mohammed hijab or Adnan rashid debate this idea. It’s easily broken and obvious that it should be looked at (hadith). Research!

I love the format of this app. It makes itreally easily to learn the Quran and be attentive to each passage.

This app is everything I needed. It’s so well thought out, you can tell the developers (may Allah reward them) really cared and understood what it is like to learn and understand the Quran word by word, so many different styles for each type of learner.

Amazing functionality but this app deliberately omitted certain verses based on the teachings of the false “Rasul” Rashad Khalifa (in my original review I used the word “Prophet”) and openly calls him the MESSENGER of God in another place (in my original review I used the word “Prophet” again). Can it therefore be trusted by orthodox Muslims? No! ** Updated review: The above was my original review which the developer calls “slander”. Really? Let’s take a look for the evidence of my two charges: According to Rashad Khalifa and his followers, the last 2 verses of Sura 9, Al-Tawba (aka Sura Al-Bara’ah), namely verses 128 and 129, ARE NOT PART OF THE AUTHENTIC QUR’AN and therefore this app does NOT have them. Check it for yourself. The evidence of my second charge is proven in the reproduced footnote below to Sura 98 (Al-Bayyinah), verse 2. What exactly am I making up? The developer suggests me saying that Rashad Khalifa was called “Prophet” of God in the app rather than “Messenger” of God constitutes slander! Fine, the app calls Rashad Khalifa “Messenger” of God and that it is Rashad Khalifa who is being referenced in Sura 98, verse 2. Really? So Allah is not referencing Muhammad ﷺ in the Qur’an when he speaks of the “Rasul” in 98:2, instead Allah is referring to Rashad Khalifa! The same Rashad Khalifa who decided to omit two verses from the Qur’an because they didn’t FIT his theory. Yeah, and we are supposed to trust this app. Download the app since it’s free. Go to 98:2 and tap on the blue asterisk in the translation to take you to the footnote. Here’s the footnote in its entirety: “Footnote *98:1-2 The proof is the Quran’s mathematical code (Appendix 1) and the messenger is Rashad Khalifa. The No. of sura (98), plus the verse No. (2), plus the numerical value of “Rashad Khalifa" (1 230) add up to 1330 (19x70), the same total as in 81:19 (App. 2).” May Allah guide this developer to the true faith and may he return the two omitted verses to this otherwise exceptional app and may he remove the absurd commentary / footnote of Sura 98:2 Update: 10/21/21: I bought the full version despite my above reservations. I figured it still had great functionality. Uhm, mistake. Don’t. The search feature is very problematic. You apparently CAN NOT search for any term in the Qur’an. Say what? A linguistic app of the Qur’an that doesn’t let you just search a random term such as كتاب? No. You can’t. You can only search by roots therefore you have to search “ك ت ب" and then it’ll give you all the results but wait, there’s more. It’ll also give you words that are the result of those 3 root letters in other combinations for instance "ب ت ك" and “ك ب ت". Uhm, that interesting if offered as an option but that’s not a proper result for just “ك ت ب". Now here’s where this app screws up disastrously: under the “grid” results it doesn’t just list all the words that are proper linguistic forms of “ك ت ب" such as كتاب or كُتُب or كاتب but ANY linguistically UNRELATED words that just happen to possess those 3 letters, for example: بكلمات (notice that it is incorrectly resulted just because it includes the letters ك ت ب) or إستكبرتم ) also incorrectly resulted for the same reason). So you have an app that isn’t just problematic religiously but has a faulty search engine. Again this app has serious potential but as for the present time my advice is “pass”.